Investigation of Risk Factors for Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency and Type 3c Diabetes After Pancreatic Surgery
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Clinical Research
VOLUME: 35 ISSUE: 3
P: 345 - 352
December 2025

Investigation of Risk Factors for Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency and Type 3c Diabetes After Pancreatic Surgery

Anatol J Gen Med Res 2025;35(3):345-352
1. Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Aydın, Türkiye
2. Aydın Atatürk State Hospital, Clinic of General Surgery, Aydın, Türkiye
3. Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, Sakarya, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 05.10.2025
Accepted Date: 12.11.2025
Online Date: 30.12.2025
Publish Date: 30.12.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and type 3c diabetes following pancreatic surgery.

Methods

A total of 48 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, preoperative diabetes history, type of surgery (Whipple, total or distal pancreatectomy), tumor stage, and biochemical parameters [CA19-9, CA125, carcinoembryonic antigen, body mass index (BMI), H-index] were recorded. Postoperative glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), C-peptide, elastase levels, and incidence of hypoglycemic episodes were evaluated. Regression analyses were performed to identify related predictors.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 59.6 years, with an average BMI of 24.1 kg/m2. Whipple procedure was the most commonly performed surgery (64.6%). Preoperative diabetes prevalence was 22.9%. CA19-9 levels showed a significant positive correlation with postoperative C-peptide levels (p=0.014). Significant predictors of HbA1c levels were preoperative diabetes (p<0.001), CA19-9 (p=0.045), and BMI (p=0.030). The incidence of hypoglycemia was 4.2%, with no significant difference in HbA1c levels (p=0.333). Postoperative elastase level was the only significant determinant of C-peptide (p=0.048).

Conclusion

Preoperative CA19-9, history of diabetes, and BMI may serve as important predictors for postoperative pancreatic dysfunction. Elastase level is a potential independent indicator of pancreatic endocrine reserve.

Keywords:
CA19-9, C-peptide, elastase, exocrine insufficiency, HbA1c, type 3c diabetes, pancreatic surgery

Introduction

The pancreas is a complex organ with both exocrine and endocrine functions. Its exocrine component secretes digestive enzymes, including trypsin, chymotrypsin, lipase, and amylase, which are essential for gastrointestinal function(1). The endocrine pancreas regulates glucose homeostasis through hormones secreted by islet cells, including insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, and pancreatic polypeptide(2). These systems are closely integrated, and any disruption may impair both.

Pancreatic surgery is performed for malignant and benign tumors, chronic pancreatitis, trauma, or cystic lesions. Common operations include pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), distal pancreatectomy, and total pancreatectomy (TP)(3). Such procedures alter pancreatic anatomy and function, predisposing patients to complications.

One of the most significant is exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), which is caused by inadequate enzyme secretion. EPI results in malnutrition, weight loss, steatorrhea, and reduced quality of life(4, 5). Management includes pancreatic enzyme-replacement therapy, dietary adjustments, and lifestyle modifications; these interventions help restore digestive function and reduce morbidity(5).

Endocrine dysfunction is also a concern, often leading to type 3c diabetes (pancreatogenic diabetes) secondary to pancreatic disease(6). Unlike type 1 or type 2 diabetes, this condition involves a deficiency of both insulin and glucagon, making glycemic control difficult. This condition is associated with chronic pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, pancreatic neoplasms, and post-pancreatectomy states(7-9). Although its prevalence is uncertain, studies suggest it accounts for 5-10% of diabetes cases(10).

Type 3c diabetes is characterized by unstable glycemic patterns, frequent hypoglycemic episodes, and impaired counterregulatory responses due to hormonal deficiencies(7, 11, 12). These issues are especially pronounced after surgery, as pancreatectomy contributes to glycemic instability(13).

Reported risk factors for EPI and type 3c diabetes include the type and extent of resection, remaining pancreatic tissue, histological features, and comorbidities(14). Yet many remain unclear, limiting the effective prediction and management.

The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of EPI and type 3c diabetes following pancreatic surgery and to identify related clinical, surgical, and pathological risk factors. The findings are intended to support improved postoperative monitoring and tailored therapeutic strategies.

Materials and Methods

Participants and Inclusion Criteria

The study included patients who underwent pancreatic surgery, specifically the Whipple procedure, distal pancreatectomy, or TP, at Aydın Adnan Menderes University Hospital between 2015 and 2024. This study approved by Aydın Adnan Menderes Unıversity Ethic Committe (approval no: 2024/140, date: 25.07.2024).

Data Collection

Demographic data, surgical details, laboratory results, and follow-up records of the participants were obtained from the hospital information management system and archived medical records. All collected data were standardized and entered into an electronic data form. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were compared in relation to both endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions.

Evaluated Parameters

Demographic variables included age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Surgical variables recorded included the type of procedure (Whipple, distal, or TP) and the duration of postoperative follow-up. Tumor staging was based on the tumor nodes metastasis (TNM) classification system, and the presence of neuroendocrine tumors was also evaluated. Preoperative biochemical parameters included CA19-9, CA125, and carcinoembryonic antigen levels; H-index; pancreatic duct diameter; and a history of preoperative diabetes. In the postoperative period, HbA1c (%), C-peptide (ng/mL), and serum elastase (ng/dL) levels were measured and analyzed as indicators of metabolic function. The occurrence of hypoglycemic episodes was also assessed as a postoperative complication. In the present study, serum elastase levels were measured. Although fecal elastase is regarded as the gold standard, it was not assessed in our patients because, as documented in the literature, its levels are influenced by oral pancreatic enzyme-replacement therapy, which our patients were receiving.

Postoperative EPI was defined as a fecal elastase level below 200 ng/dL. Type 3c diabetes was defined as newly diagnosed diabetes after pancreatic surgery in individuals with no prior history of diabetes, based on an HbA1c level ≥6.5% or a fasting plasma glucose level ≥126 mg/dL. A hypoglycemic episode was considered present in cases where plasma glucose levels were recorded as <70 mg/dL in conjunction with clinical symptoms.

Statistical Analysis

All data obtained in the study were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). To assess the distribution characteristics of continuous variables, normality tests were performed, including the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. In addition, histogram plots, Q-Q plots, and Skewness and Kurtosis values were reviewed to interpret distribution patterns. Continuous variables that were normally distributed were analyzed parametrically and are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Non-normally distributed variables were expressed as the median (minimum-maximum). Categorical variables were reported as counts and percentages. Comparisons between two groups were performed using the independent samples t-test for normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. For categorical comparisons, the Pearson chi-square test was used; however, Fisher’s exact test was applied when more than 20% of the expected cell counts were below 5. Relationships between continuous variables were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis (when normality was confirmed). Correlations between postoperative HbA1c, C-peptide, and serum elastase levels were reported with correlation coefficients (r) and p-values. To determine the effects of variables on dependent outcomes, regression analyses were performed. Initially, univariate linear regression was used to assess the effect of each independent variable. Variables found to be significant or borderline significant (p<0.20) were included in a multiple linear regression model. These models were applied to continuous outcome variables, such as postoperative levels of HbA1c, C-peptide, and serum elastase. Model fit was assessed using the F-test, and regression coefficients (B), standard errors, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were reported. Multicollinearity was assessed using the variance inflation factor. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.

Results

Table 1 presents the basic demographic characteristics and diabetes status of 48 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery. The mean age of participants was 59.6±11.0 years, and the mean BMI was 24.1±4.5 kg/m2. Of the total cohort, 43.8% (n=21) were female and 56.3% (n=27) were male. Preoperatively, 22.9% of patients (n=11) had a diagnosis of diabetes, whereas 77.1% (n=37) did not. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 21.9±27.2 months. Among the procedures performed, 13 patients (27.1%) underwent distal pancreatectomy, 4 patients (8.3%) underwent TP, and 31 patients (64.6%) underwent the Whipple procedure.

Table 2 presents the results of a multiple linear regression analysis evaluating the association between preoperative variables and postoperative HbA1c levels. The analysis revealed that both preoperative diabetes and CA19-9 levels significantly influenced postoperative HbA1c levels. Preoperative diabetes was found to have a strong, statistically significant negative effect on postoperative HbA1c levels (B=-2.858, standard coefficient B=-0.774, t=-7.267, p<0.001, 95% CI: -3.671 to -2.044), indicating that patients with preoperative diabetes had significantly lower postoperative HbA1c levels. Similarly, CA19-9 levels demonstrated a significant, albeit weak, negative effect on postoperative HbA1c levels (B=0.000, standard coefficient B=-0.297, t=-2.123, p=0.045, 95% CI: 0.000 to 0.000).

Table 3 displays the results of a multivariate linear regression analysis investigating preoperative variables that affect postoperative serum C-peptide levels. The analysis identified postoperative elastase level as the only variable with a statistically significant association with C-peptide levels (B=1.271, p=0.048, 95% CI: -0.048 to 2.590). An increase in postoperative elastase was significantly associated with higher serum C-peptide levels. No other preoperative or clinical variable showed a statistically significant correlation with postoperative C-peptide levels (all p>0.05).

Table 4 summarizes the results of a multivariate linear regression analysis evaluating preoperative variables influencing postoperative serum elastase levels. The analysis indicated that apart from age and postoperative C-peptide levels, no other variables had statistically significant effects on serum elastase levels (all p>0.05).

Table 5 presents the results of the correlation analysis between postoperative levels of HbA1c, C-peptide, and elastase. The analysis revealed a negative correlation between postoperative HbA1c and C-peptide levels (correlation coefficient=-0.263), although this relationship did not reach statistical significance (p=0.071). A positive correlation was observed between postoperative HbA1c and elastase levels (correlation coefficient=0.237); however, this finding was not statistically significant (p=0.108). Likewise, although a positive correlation was noted between postoperative C-peptide and elastase levels, the correlation did not achieve statistical significance (correlation coefficient=0.163, p=0.274).

Table 6 compares postoperative HbA1c levels between patients who experienced hypoglycemic episodes and those who did not after TP. The mean postoperative HbA1c level was 9.4±0.8 in patients who experienced hypoglycemia, compared to 7.3±1.0 in those without such episodes. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.333).

Discussion

In our study, the presence of preoperative diabetes was shown to have a significant impact on postoperative glycemic control. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative diabetes as the most influential factor affecting postoperative HbA1c levels; with diabetic patients demonstrating significantly lower HbA1c values after surgery. Interestingly, this finding contrasts with expectations in the literature, where patients with pre-existing diabetes undergoing pancreatic surgery are generally considered at higher risk of persistent postoperative hyperglycemia(15). Indeed, previous studies have reported that a history of preoperative metabolic disorders (particularly diabetes) is a strong predictor of postoperative insulin requirement(16). This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that patients with a prior diagnosis of diabetes tend to possess greater awareness of their condition, leading to better adherence to dietary recommendations and prescribed treatments.

In the general diabetic population, female patients may also be at a disadvantage compared with male patients in achieving optimal glycemic control, with a lower likelihood of reaching target HbA1c levels(17). This disparity is thought to be influenced by sex-based differences in insulin sensitivity, visceral fat distribution, and hormonal profiles(17). In our study, a significant interaction was observed between sex and preoperative diabetes status. The glycemic impact of preoperative diabetes was less pronounced in male patients than in female patients, suggesting that women with diabetes may face greater challenges in achieving postoperative glycemic targets. In addition to serving as a tumor marker for pancreatic cancer, elevated CA19-9 levels are indicative of tumor burden(18). A higher tumor burden often necessitates more extensive resections, which can lead to secondary loss of pancreatic function-particularly in the remnant tissue following a Whipple procedure, a situation often compounded by underlying chronic pancreatitis. In this context, elevated preoperative CA19-9 levels may be a predictor of postoperative endocrine and exocrine insufficiency. In our analysis, a weak but statistically significant negative correlation was observed between CA19-9 levels and postoperative HbA1c values. On the other hand, in our study, increased BMI was significantly associated with elevated postoperative HbA1c levels. This finding aligns with existing evidence that obesity impairs glycemic control by exacerbating insulin resistance(19). In one study, patients who underwent pancreatectomy and were classified as obese had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative diabetes than their non-obese counterparts (p=0.029)(15). Therefore, a high preoperative BMI is associated with poorer glycemic profiles, both to the underlying insulin resistance that predisposes individuals to type 2 diabetes and to the increased physiological burden placed on the remaining pancreatic reserve following surgery.

Our findings demonstrated a negative correlation between postoperative HbA1c and C-peptide levels (correlation coefficient=-0.263). C-peptide serves as a marker of endogenous insulin secretion and reflects the functional integrity of pancreatic b-cells. In our study, the interaction between female sex and the Whipple procedure was significantly associated with higher postoperative C-peptide levels. It is well established that surgical resection of different regions of the pancreas can have varying impacts on the development of diabetes. According to the literature, the incidence of new-onset diabetes following PD (Whipple procedure) is generally lower than the incidence observed after distal pancreatectomy(15). For instance, one study reported that among patients with normal pancreatic tissue, the incidence of diabetes after the Whipple procedure ranged from 10% and 24%, whereas after distal pancreatectomy it was more variable and often higher, ranging from 8% to as much as 60%(20, 21). Particularly in patients with underlying chronic pancreatitis, the incidence of diabetes has been shown to reach approximately 40% after the Whipple procedure and up to 85% after distal pancreatic resection(20). However, a study by Lee et al.(16) suggested that the primary determinant of diabetes development after pancreatectomy is the patient’s pre-resection insulin secretory capacity, while factors such as BMI or the extent of pancreatic tissue resected play a secondary role. In this context, the observation that female patients exhibited higher postoperative C-peptide levels may be attributed to a more robust β-cell reserve prior to surgery.

In a study by Kato et al.(22), the incidence of endocrine insufficiency was reported as 14%, while exocrine insufficiency was found to be 24%. In a comprehensive review, Pathanki et al.(23) reported that the frequency of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) following PD ranged from 38% to 93%. In our study, the incidence of postoperative diabetes was 24.4%, consistent with findings reported in the literature. We specifically evaluated postoperative HbA1c elevation and the rate of exocrine insufficiency, and found significant associations with parameters such as preoperative diabetes, CA19-9 levels, and BMI. Similarly, Kato et al.(22) highlighted that high preoperative HbA1c, elevated BMI, and reduced residual pancreatic volume are major risk factors for both endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiencies. However, in contrast to their findings, our study revealed a negative association of both preoperative diabetes and CA19-9 levels with postoperative HbA1c elevation.

In our study, the postoperative diabetes incidence was 24.4%, which is consistent with findings reported in the literature. We specifically evaluated postoperative HbA1c elevation and the rate of exocrine insufficiency, demonstrating significant associations with parameters such as preoperative diabetes, CA19-9 levels, and BMI. Similarly, Kato et al.(22) highlighted that high preoperative HbA1c, elevated BMI, and reduced residual pancreatic volume are major risk factors for both endocrine and exocrine insufficiency. However, in contrast to their findings, our study revealed a negative association between preoperative diabetes and CA19-9 levels with postoperative HbA1c elevation.

In a study conducted by Iwase et al.(24), significant differences in the postoperative trajectory of serum elastase-1 levels were observed depending on the type of surgical procedure performed. In patients who underwent TP, elastase levels were reported to decline rapidly, dropping below the lower limit of the normal range (120 ng/dL) by postoperative day 14. In contrast, in patients who underwent PD (Whipple) or distal pancreatectomy, elastase levels initially increased during the first 7 days-likely due to the presence of residual pancreatic tissue-but were reported to normalize within two weeks postoperatively. In their 2020 study evaluating the development of PEI following PD, Pathanki et al.(23) identified preoperative serum elastase levels as an important predictive marker. They reported that a significant postoperative decline in elastase levels was associated with the onset of PEI. Additionally, they noted that low postoperative elastase levels were linked to diabetes, lower BMI, and advanced age. Our study yielded similar findings regarding postoperative elastase levels; specifically, the presence of preoperative diabetes had a significant negative impact on elastase concentrations. Furthermore, a near-significant positive correlation was observed between patient age and elastase levels. Moreover, we chose to use serum elastase levels to assess exocrine insufficiency, as this parameter is not influenced by the administration of pancreatic enzyme supplements(25). However, in our study, no significant differences in serum elastase levels were observed based on the type of surgical procedure performed, including TP. Therefore, we suggest that serum elastase may not be a fully reliable indicator of postoperative exocrine pancreatic function.

Study Limitations

Despite the strengths of this study, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the retrospective design and reliance on hospital records may have introduced bias due to missing data, recording errors, or variability in follow-up documentation, which could affect data reliability. Additionally, the study’s relatively small sample size and single-center setting limit the generalizability of the findings. Future multicenter, prospective studies with larger patient cohorts are warranted to more clearly elucidate the predictive value of the investigated parameters.

Conclusion

In conclusion, preoperative parameters such as CA19-9 levels, diabetes, and BMI should be carefully considered during postoperative follow-up, as they are associated with an increased risk of subsequent endocrine and exocrine insufficiency after pancreatic surgery. Based on these findings, patients with elevated CA19-9 and obesity may benefit from closer monitoring and early intervention targeting pancreatic function in the postoperative period. Furthermore, routine follow-up of HbA1c and elastase levels after surgery is crucial for the early detection of emerging diabetes and malabsorption.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study approved by Aydın Adnan Menderes Unıversity Ethic Committee (approval no: 8, date: 25.07.2024).
Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practises: S.A., O.A., E.B.C., A.E., M.Ç.C., Concept: S.A., O.A., E.B.C., Design: S.A., A.E., M.Ç.C., V.T., Data Collection or Processing: S.A., O.A., E.B.C., Analysis or Interpretation: S.A., O.A., E.B.C., Literature Search: S.A., M.Ç.C., V.T., Writing: S.A.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Atkinson MA, Campbell-Thompson M, Kusmartseva I, Kaestner KH. Organisation of the human pancreas in health and in diabetes. Diabetologia. 2020;63:1966-73.
2
Pignatelli C, Campo F, Neroni A, Piemonti L, Citro A. Bioengineering the vascularized endocrine pancreas: a fine-tuned ınterplay between vascularization, extracellular-matrix-based scaffold architecture, and ınsulin-producing cells. Transpl Int. 2022;35:10555.
3
Adsay NV, Basturk O, Saka B, et al. Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:480-93.
4
Whitcomb DC, Buchner AM, Forsmark CE. AGA clinical practice update on the epidemiology, evaluation, and management of exocrine pancreatic ınsufficiency: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2023;165:1292-301.
5
Lindkvist B. Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:7258-66.
6
Vonderau JS, Desai CS. Type 3c: understanding pancreatogenic diabetes. JAAPA. 2022;35:20-4.
7
Ewald N, Bretzel RG. Diabetes mellitus secondary to pancreatic diseases (Type 3c) -- are we neglecting an important disease? Eur J Intern Med. 2013;24:203-6.
8
Enríquez-Navascués JM, Borda N, Lizerazu A, et al. Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer after a multidisciplinary approach. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1674-84.
9
Katsenos S, Becker HD. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a rare chronic disease, difficult to treat, with potential to lung cancer transformation: apropos of two cases and a brief literature review. Case Rep Oncol. 2011;4:162-71.
10
Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28:169-80.
11
Knop FK, Vilsbøll T, Holst JJ. Incretin-based therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2009;10:46-55.
12
Cúrdia Gonçalves T, Capela TL, Cotter J. Nutrition in pancreatic diseases: a roadmap for the gastroenterologist. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2023;31:1-13.
13
Keskin Ö, Balcı B. Diabetes mellitus and cardiovasculary complications. Kafkas J Med Sci. 2011;2:81-5.
14
Hart PA, Bellin MD, Andersen DK, et al. Type 3c (pancreatogenic) diabetes mellitus secondary to chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:226-37.
15
Kim KJ, Jeong CY, Jeong SH, et al. Pancreatic diabetes after distal pancreatectomy: incidence rate and risk factors. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2011;15:123-7.
16
Lee BW, Kang HW, Heo JS, et al. Insulin secretory defect plays a major role in the development of diabetes in patients with distal pancreatectomy. Metabolism. 2006;55:135-41.
17
Choe SA, Kim JY, Ro YS, Cho SI. Women are less likely than men to achieve optimal glycemic control after 1 year of treatment: a multi-level analysis of a Korean primary care cohort. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0196719.
18
Ballehaninna UK, Chamberlain RS. The clinical utility of serum CA 19-9 in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an evidence-based appraisal. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2012;3:105-19.
19
Hutchins RR, Hart RS, Pacifico M, Bradley NJ, Williamson RC. Long-term results of distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis in 90 patients. Ann Surg. 2002;236:612-8.
20
Huang JJ, Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, et al. Quality of life and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2000;231:890-8.
21
Lemaire E, O’Toole D, Sauvanet A, Hammel P, Belghiti J, Ruszniewski P. Functional and morphological changes in the pancreatic remnant following pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastric anastomosis. Br J Surg. 2000;87:434-8.
22
Kato T, Watanabe Y, Oshima Y, et al. Long-term outcomes and risk factors of pancreatic insufficiency after a pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective study. Surgery. 2024;176:880-9.
23
Pathanki AM, Attard JA, Bradley E, et al. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy: current evidence and management. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2020;11:20-31.
24
Iwase K, Miyata M, Tanaka Y, Izukura M, Nakaba H, Matsuda H. Serial changes in plasma levels of pancreatic elastase 1 after pancreatic surgeries. Res Exp Med (Berl). 1995;195:93-100.
25
Vanga RR, Tansel A, Sidiq S, El-Serag HB, Othman MO. Diagnostic performance of measurement of fecal elastase-1 in detection of exocrine pancreatic ınsufficiency: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1220-8.