Scientific Evaluation-Process of The Journal of SSK Tepecik Teaching Hospital: The effect of the time- duration in the evaluation-process.
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
VOLUME: 7 ISSUE: 1
P: 53 - 56
1997

Scientific Evaluation-Process of The Journal of SSK Tepecik Teaching Hospital: The effect of the time- duration in the evaluation-process.

Anatol J Gen Med Res 1997;7(1):53-56
1. SSK Tepecik Eğilim Hastanesi 1. Genel Cerrahi Kliniği Dergisi Koordinatörü
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 2015-06-26T14:43:22
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the relationship between peer review and delayed publishing in 48 paper which admitted to our journal in last two years. Editorial-reply period was 103 days on average. peer reviewer-reply period was 26 days on average. Author's reply was 54 days on avarage. So the complete publishing-process took 11.7 months on average. So the compiete pubiishing-process took 11.7 months on average. These results show that the peer review period of a paper is less than 50 percent of overall publishing process is the main cause of delayed publishing in our journal.

Keywords:
Medical Journals, Medical Publishing